Triple

T293301
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Puerto Ricans E6039 entity
Predicate politicalStatusDebate P8604 FINISHED
Object statehood vs. independence vs. status quo LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: statehood vs. independence vs. status quo | Statement: [Puerto Ricans, politicalStatusDebate, statehood vs. independence vs. status quo]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: politicalStatusDebate
Context triple: [Puerto Ricans, politicalStatusDebate, statehood vs. independence vs. status quo]
  • A. hasDebate chosen
    Indicates that there is a formal discussion or argument between entities, typically presenting opposing viewpoints on a topic.
  • B. languageOfDebate
    Indicates that a specified language is the one used for conducting a particular debate.
  • C. politicalRationale
    Indicates the reasoning, justification, or strategic considerations underlying a political decision, stance, or action.
  • D. electoralStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of an entity in relation to an election process (e.g., running, elected, defeated, or not a candidate).
  • E. debateCountGeneralElection
    Indicates the number of debates held in the context of a general election.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e79114b081909490b3bf5a5dbb51 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ea0dd1dc8190aecd5afdeb2fd74b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e934b4408190b53a17f57a02df65 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.