Triple
T2932642
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Advisory Committee opinions |
E78989
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | human-rights monitoring document |
C3141
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: human-rights monitoring document Context triple: [Advisory Committee opinions, instanceOf, human-rights monitoring document]
-
A.
human rights monitoring mechanism
A human rights monitoring mechanism is a structured system of institutions, procedures, and tools designed to systematically observe, assess, and report on states’ compliance with international and domestic human rights obligations.
-
B.
human rights journal
A human rights journal is a periodical publication that documents, analyzes, and critiques issues, cases, and developments related to the protection and promotion of human rights.
-
C.
human rights research center
A human rights research center is an organization dedicated to systematically studying, documenting, and analyzing human rights issues to inform policy, advocacy, and public awareness.
-
D.
United Nations human rights review mechanism
chosen
A United Nations human rights review mechanism is a formal, periodic process through which UN bodies assess and monitor states’ compliance with international human rights obligations, typically involving state reports, independent expert or peer review, and public recommendations for improvement.
-
E.
human rights initiative
A human rights initiative is an organized effort or program aimed at promoting, protecting, and advancing fundamental human rights and freedoms for individuals or communities.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b0d40b481908bc2a5fa2e73c3fb |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:55 p.m.