Triple
T29314038
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hammett equation |
E743329
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | quantitative structure–reactivity relationship |
C54814
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: quantitative structure–reactivity relationship Context triple: [Hammett equation, instanceOf, quantitative structure–reactivity relationship]
-
A.
organic reaction
An organic reaction is a chemical transformation involving organic compounds, where bonds between carbon and other atoms are broken and formed to yield new molecular structures.
-
B.
cheminformatics software
Cheminformatics software is a class of computational tools designed to store, analyze, visualize, and predict chemical structures and properties using algorithms and molecular data.
-
C.
tool in quantum chemistry
A tool in quantum chemistry is a computational or experimental method, algorithm, or instrument used to model, analyze, or predict the electronic structure and properties of molecular and condensed-matter systems based on quantum mechanical principles.
-
D.
organic compound
An organic compound is a chemical substance that contains carbon atoms covalently bonded to other elements, typically hydrogen, and often includes additional elements such as oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, or halogens.
-
E.
chemical database provider
A chemical database provider is an organization or service that collects, curates, maintains, and distributes structured information about chemical substances, their properties, structures, and related data for research, regulatory, and industrial use.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f0912502c8819087d9e8398ee991a8 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 10:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 1:18 p.m.