Triple

T292937
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hugo van Lawick E6032 entity
Predicate knownForVisualStyle P753 FINISHED
Object intimate close-up wildlife footage LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: intimate close-up wildlife footage | Statement: [Hugo van Lawick, knownForVisualStyle, intimate close-up wildlife footage]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: knownForVisualStyle
Context triple: [Hugo van Lawick, knownForVisualStyle, intimate close-up wildlife footage]
  • A. recognizedAs
    Indicates that one entity is acknowledged or accepted as having the identity, role, status, or classification of another entity.
  • B. recognizedFor chosen
    Indicates that one entity is acknowledged, credited, or honored for a particular achievement, quality, contribution, or work associated with another entity.
  • C. relatedStyle
    Indicates that one style is associated with, similar to, or derived from another style in some relevant way.
  • D. recognizedIn
    Indicates that an entity is formally acknowledged, honored, or given recognition within a particular context, setting, or domain.
  • E. usedWithStyle
    Indicates that something is employed or applied in conjunction with a particular style or stylistic manner.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2e79114b081909490b3bf5a5dbb51 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:03 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a2ea0dd1dc8190aecd5afdeb2fd74b completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2e934b4408190b53a17f57a02df65 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:10 p.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:06 p.m.