Triple
T29199739
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Labour Front |
E740235
|
entity |
| Predicate | electoralOutcome1959 |
P193538
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lost majority to People’s Action Party |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lost majority to People’s Action Party | Statement: [Labour Front, electoralOutcome1959, lost majority to People’s Action Party]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: electoralOutcome1959 Context triple: [Labour Front, electoralOutcome1959, lost majority to People’s Action Party]
-
A.
resultIn1955Election
Indicates that one event or action led to or caused a particular outcome in the 1955 election.
-
B.
electionResult2019
Indicates the outcome or status of an entity in the 2019 election, such as who won, lost, or what result was obtained.
-
C.
statusIn1999Election
Indicates the role or standing an entity held in the 1999 election (such as candidate status, office sought, or electoral outcome) in relation to that election event.
-
D.
electoralSuccess
Indicates that an entity has achieved a favorable or winning outcome in an election or electoral process.
-
E.
electoralVoteOutcome
Indicates the result of an election in terms of how electoral votes are allocated or distributed among candidates or options.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f07cb974108190b7e86ca489a6ebb6 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd49f6dbac81909744373a357b7982 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd48ed68f481908374183c66a6b055 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:22 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fd49f612a4819096fe7d5a3bb439ba |
completed | May 8, 2026, 2:27 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 12:06 p.m.