Triple
T2918422
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1994 Agreement relating to the Implementation of Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea |
E78661
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | implementing agreement |
C3153
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: implementing agreement Context triple: [1994 Agreement relating to the Implementation of Part XI of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, instanceOf, implementing agreement]
-
A.
political agreement
A political agreement is a negotiated understanding or formal accord between political actors or entities that defines shared commitments, terms, and responsibilities on specific issues or policies.
-
B.
naming agreement
A naming agreement is a legal contract in which one party grants another the right to use a specific name (such as a personal, brand, or facility name) under defined terms and conditions.
-
C.
international agreement implementation area
The international agreement implementation area is a defined domain—such as a sector, region, or policy field—within which the provisions of an international agreement are applied, monitored, and enforced.
-
D.
legal agreement
chosen
A legal agreement is a formally recognized arrangement between two or more parties that creates enforceable rights and obligations under the law.
-
E.
baseball agreement
A baseball agreement is a formal contract outlining the terms, conditions, and obligations between parties involved in professional or amateur baseball activities, such as players, teams, leagues, or sponsors.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad8b0c2ad081909ff87050ae542bb9 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:43 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 2:54 p.m.