Triple
T29160421
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Case Against Intelligent Design |
E739170
|
entity |
| Predicate | describesIntelligentDesignAs |
P177554
|
FINISHED |
| Object | unscientific |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unscientific | Statement: [The Case Against Intelligent Design, describesIntelligentDesignAs, unscientific]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: describesIntelligentDesignAs Context triple: [The Case Against Intelligent Design, describesIntelligentDesignAs, unscientific]
-
A.
isDesignedAs
Indicates that something has been intentionally created or configured to serve as or function in the role of something else.
-
B.
designDescription
Indicates that an entity has a textual explanation or summary of its design, structure, or intended configuration.
-
C.
evolutionaryDescription
Indicates how an entity has changed, adapted, or developed over time through evolutionary processes.
-
D.
usesIntelligence
Indicates that an entity applies mental abilities such as reasoning, problem-solving, or understanding to perform an action or achieve a goal.
-
E.
typeOfIntelligence
Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or category of intelligence in relation to another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f07cb528fc8190a556b73990c347c8 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7009d39508190af7301f824615e88 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 8 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6fc53f4f881908dcc698687bbb64d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:42 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f6ffb7554881908993d6d2ffbcf8f5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 7:56 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:47 a.m.