Triple

T29132000
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Paragraphs on Conceptual Art E738404 entity
Predicate inArtDiscourse P166353 FINISHED
Object foundational statement of conceptual art priorities LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: foundational statement of conceptual art priorities | Statement: [Paragraphs on Conceptual Art, inArtDiscourse, foundational statement of conceptual art priorities]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inArtDiscourse
Context triple: [Paragraphs on Conceptual Art, inArtDiscourse, foundational statement of conceptual art priorities]
  • A. inArtSince
    Indicates that an entity has been involved or active in the field of art starting from a specified time.
  • B. publicArt
    Indicates that something is an artwork installed or displayed in a publicly accessible space.
  • C. artMovement
    Indicates the artistic movement or style with which an artwork, artist, or cultural work is associated.
  • D. inArtAndIconography
    Indicates that one entity is depicted, represented, or symbolically expressed through artistic works or iconographic imagery related to another entity.
  • E. artHistoricalDebate
    Indicates that there is a scholarly disagreement or discussion within art history concerning the interpretation, attribution, significance, or context of the related entity or work.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f07cb29cdc8190afa55444553de60c completed April 28, 2026, 9:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6622e80e881908dabf6eac447a973 completed May 2, 2026, 8:44 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f65c2376a08190be5215171e908e69 completed May 2, 2026, 8:18 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f65f75ac608190a62cd6afce14f68e completed May 2, 2026, 8:32 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:32 a.m.