Triple

T29118348
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Northern Advance Doctrine E737106 entity
Predicate natureOfDoctrine P169300 FINISHED
Object offensive strategy LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: offensive strategy | Statement: [Northern Advance Doctrine, natureOfDoctrine, offensive strategy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: natureOfDoctrine
Context triple: [Northern Advance Doctrine, natureOfDoctrine, offensive strategy]
  • A. doctrineOf
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is the doctrinal teaching, principle, or belief system associated with, derived from, or formally held by another entity.
  • B. levelOfDoctrine
    Indicates the degree or stage of development, authority, or complexity associated with a particular doctrine within a given system or context.
  • C. doctrinalTheme
    Indicates that one entity concerns, expresses, or is characterized by a particular doctrinal or theological theme in relation to another.
  • D. doctrinalDomain
    Indicates the specific area of doctrine or body of teachings within which a belief, statement, or rule is classified.
  • E. goalOfDoctrine
    Indicates that a specified objective or end state is the intended goal or purpose of a particular doctrine.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f077ed54e08190bb02a744e8121a66 completed April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f67de7792c81909b5e4e812d143624 completed May 2, 2026, 10:42 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f678ce54b081908c26edfd49e39c60 completed May 2, 2026, 10:21 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f67d31cc60819084f64bd056e1ea4d completed May 2, 2026, 10:39 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 11:23 a.m.