Triple
T29028367
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Bunte Blätter, Op. 99, No. 4 |
E737656
|
entity |
| Predicate | dedicatedComposerOfVariations |
P168644
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Johannes Brahms |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Johannes Brahms | Statement: [Bunte Blätter, Op. 99, No. 4, dedicatedComposerOfVariations, Johannes Brahms]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dedicatedComposerOfVariations Context triple: [Bunte Blätter, Op. 99, No. 4, dedicatedComposerOfVariations, Johannes Brahms]
-
A.
dedicatedComposerTradition
Indicates that a composer is specifically devoted to or closely aligned with a particular musical tradition.
-
B.
commissionedComposer
Indicates that one entity formally requested and funded another entity (a composer) to create a musical work.
-
C.
favoriteComposer
Indicates that one entity is the preferred or most liked composer of another entity.
-
D.
hasComposerInResidence
Indicates that an organization or institution has officially appointed a specific composer to serve in a resident or ongoing compositional role.
-
E.
composedForMusicBy
Indicates that a musical work was specifically created or written by a particular composer.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f077ef00fc81909325f084ad37c035 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f67595fa7c8190b6e9f7a8c700dd97 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f673c4abec8190bc2379e66f4af0a9 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:59 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f674df80b08190adb7f7531083bbb1 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 10:04 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 9:54 a.m.