Triple
T29006201
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Toquepala copper deposit |
E736440
|
entity |
| Predicate | majorOreMineral |
P64309
|
FINISHED |
| Object | chalcopyrite |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: chalcopyrite | Statement: [Toquepala copper deposit, majorOreMineral, chalcopyrite]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: majorOreMineral Context triple: [Toquepala copper deposit, majorOreMineral, chalcopyrite]
-
A.
primaryOreTypes
chosen
Indicates the main types of ore that are predominantly associated with or extracted from a given entity.
-
B.
typeOfMineralProduced
Indicates that a specified mineral is produced or extracted as a result of a particular process, operation, or source.
-
C.
hasImportantMineral
Indicates that an entity contains or is associated with a mineral considered significant or valuable in a given context.
-
D.
discoveryOfOre
Indicates the event or relationship in which a particular ore deposit is found, identified, or recognized, typically linking the discoverer, the ore, and the location or time of discovery.
-
E.
majorMine
Indicates that a mine is classified as a major or primary mining site, typically based on its scale, output, or importance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f077eb81e88190ad9ff62cbb9f555e |
completed | April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd7e364a648190a1e9e1d9fc76e99e |
completed | May 8, 2026, 6:09 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd7bb547608190a3b04dddbca6b8bc |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:59 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 9:38 a.m.