Triple

T28994584
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Elite Model Management E736118 entity
Predicate talentType P166276 FINISHED
Object female models LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: female models | Statement: [Elite Model Management, talentType, female models]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: talentType
Context triple: [Elite Model Management, talentType, female models]
  • A. discoversTalentOf
    Indicates that one entity identifies or recognizes the talent or abilities possessed by another entity.
  • B. performerType
    Indicates the role or category of performer responsible for carrying out an action or participating in an event.
  • C. skillType
    Indicates the specific category or kind of skill that characterizes or classifies an associated skill-related entity or action.
  • D. talentAgent
    Indicates that one entity serves as a professional representative or manager (a talent agent) for another entity’s artistic, athletic, or entertainment career.
  • E. typicalPerformerRoleType
    Indicates the usual or characteristic role type that a performer commonly plays or is associated with in their performances.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f077eacd0481908ef0bafd74491cd0 completed April 28, 2026, 9:03 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f66003a3f48190a2ba6da5aafbb5cb completed May 2, 2026, 8:35 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f65c2198208190a3954086c22cfcbf completed May 2, 2026, 8:18 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f65f75ac608190a62cd6afce14f68e completed May 2, 2026, 8:32 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 9:29 a.m.