Triple

T28969065
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Kylos E734221 entity
Predicate fictionalNature P187379 FINISHED
Object imaginary astronomical object LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: imaginary astronomical object | Statement: [Kylos, fictionalNature, imaginary astronomical object]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: fictionalNature
Context triple: [Kylos, fictionalNature, imaginary astronomical object]
  • A. fictionalType
    Indicates that one entity is a fictional or imaginary type or category of the other entity.
  • B. fictionalFocus
    Indicates that the primary emphasis or attention within a context is placed on fictional content, elements, or aspects.
  • C. fictionalOrigin
    Indicates that one entity originates from, or was first introduced within, a fictional work, universe, or narrative created by another entity.
  • D. fictionalGenre
    Indicates that a work of fiction belongs to or is categorized under a particular narrative genre or style.
  • E. fictionalContent
    Indicates that one entity is content whose subject matter, events, or characters are imaginary or invented rather than factual.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f05b0d1e7c819092baab93d3fe277e completed April 28, 2026, 7 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fb563aec448190875410fb1a3ed624 completed May 6, 2026, 2:54 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fb35b9ede881908aaae93a215525df completed May 6, 2026, 12:36 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fb563a28d88190b28345c465c545f8 completed May 6, 2026, 2:54 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 9:04 a.m.