Triple

T28915775
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lamento E733357 entity
Predicate hasWorkTitleType P186960 FINISHED
Object descriptive title LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: descriptive title | Statement: [Lamento, hasWorkTitleType, descriptive title]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasWorkTitleType
Context triple: [Lamento, hasWorkTitleType, descriptive title]
  • A. hasTitleWork
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific work by its title (i.e., the entity has or bears that work’s title).
  • B. hasWorkTitleElement
    Indicates that an entity includes a specific textual component representing a work’s title or part of a work’s title.
  • C. hasWorkTitleVariant
    Indicates that an entity has an alternative or variant form of its work title, such as a different wording, spelling, or language version of the same title.
  • D. hasWorkingTitle
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a provisional or temporary title used during its development or production.
  • E. hasWorkTitlePattern
    Indicates that an entity’s work title follows or matches a specified pattern or structured format.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f05b0a5cc0819094828367ae204b70 completed April 28, 2026, 7 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fb2e940d5c8190bceae77daf4ef512 completed May 6, 2026, 12:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f9fec70bd881909c658a3c5020318b completed May 5, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fb2e9309fc81909dfefd9020d6fbad completed May 6, 2026, 12:05 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:14 a.m.