Triple
T28912097
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Heaven Sent |
E733253
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasChilloutAppeal |
P182754
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Heaven Sent, hasChilloutAppeal, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasChilloutAppeal Context triple: [Heaven Sent, hasChilloutAppeal, true]
-
A.
hasMassAppeal
Indicates that something possesses qualities or characteristics that attract or are appealing to a very large, broad, or general audience.
-
B.
hasEnduringAppeal
Indicates that something continues to attract interest, admiration, or enjoyment over a long period of time.
-
C.
hasAppealsTo
Indicates that one entity formally challenges or seeks review of a decision, judgment, or outcome through another entity or process.
-
D.
canBeAppealedTo
Indicates that a decision, action, or authority is subject to being challenged or reviewed by a higher or alternative authority through an appeal process.
-
E.
hasChancel
Indicates that something possesses or includes a chancel as part of its structure or layout.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f05b096d208190958a57d2e4b5a93a |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7908ec35881909a42f954fb9fa16e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f78e2ac3fc819081a45c6841375c8d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:04 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f78fd3fd888190b7db0b563f298585 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 6:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:12 a.m.