Triple
T28900066
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mostek |
E732928
|
entity |
| Predicate | technologyInnovation |
P1484
|
FINISHED |
| Object | address multiplexing for DRAM |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: address multiplexing for DRAM | Statement: [Mostek, technologyInnovation, address multiplexing for DRAM]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: technologyInnovation Context triple: [Mostek, technologyInnovation, address multiplexing for DRAM]
-
A.
innovation
chosen
Indicates the introduction or development of something new or significantly improved compared to existing methods, products, or ideas.
-
B.
technologyParadigm
Indicates a relationship where one entity represents or defines the overarching technological model, framework, or approach within which another entity operates or is categorized.
-
C.
technologyTrend
Indicates a relationship where a technology is characterized as part of a broader pattern of change or direction in technological development over time.
-
D.
technologyPioneered
Indicates that an entity was the first or among the first to develop, introduce, or significantly advance a particular technology.
-
E.
technologyEffect
Indicates the impact or influence that a particular technology has on another entity, system, or outcome.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f05b08c2008190ac426a035a2ed66d |
completed | April 28, 2026, 7 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f6691f5e188190b12c7b2eb729a45e |
completed | May 2, 2026, 9:14 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f6659b62fc8190b21555d0ba54db2d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:59 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:02 a.m.