Triple

T28898954
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Darius E732901 entity
Predicate featuresEnemyTheme P197902 FINISHED
Object mechanical sea creatures LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mechanical sea creatures | Statement: [Darius, featuresEnemyTheme, mechanical sea creatures]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: featuresEnemyTheme
Context triple: [Darius, featuresEnemyTheme, mechanical sea creatures]
  • A. battleTheme
    Indicates that a particular piece of music or motif is used or associated as the theme during a battle or combat encounter between entities.
  • B. featuresThemeBy
    Indicates that something (such as a work, event, or product) prominently includes or centers around a particular theme created or defined by a specified source or entity.
  • C. featuresAntagonistEntity
    Indicates that the subject includes or involves an entity serving as an antagonist in the context of a narrative, interaction, or scenario.
  • D. featuresBattle
    Indicates that one entity includes, presents, or involves a battle as a significant element or event.
  • E. enemyType
    Indicates that one entity is classified as an enemy of a specified type or category in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f05b08c2008190ac426a035a2ed66d completed April 28, 2026, 7 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69feb8e856d48190aa34ad8ee8376e1c completed May 9, 2026, 4:32 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69feb82a2b6c8190a473cc25976897be completed May 9, 2026, 4:29 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69feb8e6ed7881908446745c89c30784 completed May 9, 2026, 4:32 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 8:01 a.m.