Triple

T28872524
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject FHIR Binary E732175 entity
Predicate securityContextDatatype P176313 FINISHED
Object Reference LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Reference | Statement: [FHIR Binary, securityContextDatatype, Reference]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: securityContextDatatype
Context triple: [FHIR Binary, securityContextDatatype, Reference]
  • A. securityContext
    Indicates the security-related settings or constraints under which an action, process, or interaction is performed.
  • B. securityScope
    Indicates the range or extent of protection, permissions, or access control that applies within a given security context.
  • C. securityRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific security-related role, permission level, or access profile within a system or context.
  • D. securityAccess
    Indicates that one entity has permission, authorization, or the ability to access or interact with another entity in a security-controlled context.
  • E. securityType
    Indicates the classification or category of security associated with an entity, such as the type of financial instrument, protection mechanism, or access control applied.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f05b06807c81909b4bbd4c20403a2b completed April 28, 2026, 7 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6dfcafd0c81908d86662948c539d6 completed May 3, 2026, 5:40 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6de07836481908785cde9c511920b completed May 3, 2026, 5:32 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6df418f488190a5e7ff41f32dceda completed May 3, 2026, 5:38 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 7:34 a.m.