Triple

T2884919
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee E59482 entity
Predicate fullName P16 FINISHED
Object Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. v. Democratic National Committee, et al. E59482 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. v. Democratic National Committee, et al. | Statement: [Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, fullName, Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. v. Democratic National Committee, et al.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. v. Democratic National Committee, et al.
Context triple: [Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee, fullName, Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al. v. Democratic National Committee, et al.]
  • A. Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee chosen
    Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the scope of federal protections against voting discrimination, particularly under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
  • B. Arizona v. United States
    Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
  • C. Colorado Department of State v. Baca
    Colorado Department of State v. Baca is a U.S. federal court case addressing whether states can remove or sanction presidential electors who refuse to vote in accordance with their state's popular vote in the Electoral College.
  • D. Trump v. Vance
    Trump v. Vance is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a sitting president is not absolutely immune from state criminal subpoenas, allowing a New York grand jury to obtain Donald Trump’s financial records.
  • E. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab4ac739188190a112f42a5a69c951 completed March 6, 2026, 9:44 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abe04476588190b0db0880e14c79b5 completed March 7, 2026, 8:22 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b0316c4fa481909cd5b26ec346d885 completed March 10, 2026, 2:57 p.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 10:03 p.m.