Triple
T287300
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Domain Name System root zone |
E5910
|
entity |
| Predicate | isIdentifiedBy |
P3732
|
FINISHED |
| Object | root zone file |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: root zone file | Statement: [Domain Name System root zone, isIdentifiedBy, root zone file]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isIdentifiedBy Context triple: [Domain Name System root zone, isIdentifiedBy, root zone file]
-
A.
identifierFor
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as a unique identifying label or code for another entity.
-
B.
hasIdentity
Indicates that one entity is the same as, or is identified as, another specific entity or identifier.
-
C.
hasIdentifierSystem
Indicates that an entity is associated with a particular system or scheme used to assign and manage its identifiers.
-
D.
selfIdentification
Indicates that an entity defines or declares its own identity, attributes, or classification about itself.
-
E.
recognizedFor
Indicates that one entity is acknowledged, credited, or honored for a particular achievement, quality, contribution, or work associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25946a7ac8190a78871c210213272 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25e2ddaa88190b08c40b5823f30a0 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b7c1448819082064f474633acd5 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 3:02 a.m.