Triple

T287228
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject RSA E5909 entity
Predicate consideredInsecureAtKeySize P9244 FINISHED
Object 512 bits LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 512 bits | Statement: [RSA, consideredInsecureAtKeySize, 512 bits]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: consideredInsecureAtKeySize
Context triple: [RSA, consideredInsecureAtKeySize, 512 bits]
  • A. usesEncryptionAlgorithm
    Indicates that one entity applies or relies on a specific encryption algorithm to protect data or communications.
  • B. hasCrypt
    Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is associated with a crypt belonging to or located within it.
  • C. estimatedStrength
    Indicates that a value represents an approximate or inferred level, magnitude, or intensity of something rather than a precisely measured strength.
  • D. securityType
    Indicates the classification or category of security associated with an entity, such as the type of financial instrument, protection mechanism, or access control applied.
  • E. usesInitializationVectorLength
    Indicates that an entity employs an initialization vector (IV) of a specified length in a cryptographic or security-related operation.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a25946a7ac8190a78871c210213272 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25e2ddaa88190b08c40b5823f30a0 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:17 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b7c1448819082064f474633acd5 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a25d3463648190ac716d7475378536 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:12 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 3:02 a.m.