Triple

T28710813
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Constantina E729826 entity
Predicate marriageToConstantiusGallus P177544 FINISHED
Object political dynastic alliance LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: political dynastic alliance | Statement: [Constantina, marriageToConstantiusGallus, political dynastic alliance]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: marriageToConstantiusGallus
Context triple: [Constantina, marriageToConstantiusGallus, political dynastic alliance]
  • A. marriedToEmperor
    Indicates that one entity is the spouse of an emperor, signifying a marital relationship to a reigning or titled emperor.
  • B. placeOfMarriageToEmpressMatilda
    Indicates the location where an individual married Empress Matilda.
  • C. marriageFormedBy
    Indicates that a marriage relationship was created or brought into existence by a specific event, action, or process.
  • D. succeededByInMarriageToHenryI
    Indicates that one person became the subsequent spouse of Henry I, following a previous spouse in marriage to him.
  • E. marriageDateToEmpressMatilda
    Indicates the date on which an individual married Empress Matilda.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f043e7d5a4819094b18aca10b1e024 completed April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7009d39508190af7301f824615e88 completed May 3, 2026, 8 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6fc53f4f881908dcc698687bbb64d completed May 3, 2026, 7:42 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f6ffb7554881908993d6d2ffbcf8f5 completed May 3, 2026, 7:56 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:48 a.m.