Triple
T28699556
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | GS Capital Partners |
E729510
|
entity |
| Predicate | typicalInvestor |
P29189
|
FINISHED |
| Object | institutional investor |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: institutional investor | Statement: [GS Capital Partners, typicalInvestor, institutional investor]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typicalInvestor Context triple: [GS Capital Partners, typicalInvestor, institutional investor]
-
A.
typicalInvestorConsideration
Indicates that something is regarded as a standard or common factor that investors typically take into account when making investment decisions.
-
B.
investorUse
Indicates that an investor makes use of, employs, or utilizes a particular resource, tool, strategy, or service in the context of their investing activities.
-
C.
investmentAdvisor
Indicates that one entity provides professional guidance or management services to another regarding financial investments.
-
D.
typeOfInvestor
chosen
Indicates the kind or category of investor that a given entity is classified as.
-
E.
investorPerception
Indicates how investors view, interpret, or evaluate a company, asset, or financial situation, including their expectations, confidence, and sentiment about its future performance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f043e6e9688190b6bdd6e5665498ff |
completed | April 28, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a00d76d0e0881908d83a8dcce511167 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:07 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a00d711805881909a94cfd1f25fb331 |
completed | May 10, 2026, 7:05 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:41 a.m.