Triple
T286898
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Linux |
E5903
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsSecurityFeature |
P203
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Linux capabilities |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Linux capabilities | Statement: [Linux, supportsSecurityFeature, Linux capabilities]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsSecurityFeature Context triple: [Linux, supportsSecurityFeature, Linux capabilities]
-
A.
hasSecuritySupport
Indicates that one entity provides security-related assistance, maintenance, or protection services for another entity.
-
B.
supportsFeature
chosen
Indicates that one entity provides, enables, or is compatible with a particular feature or capability of another.
-
C.
securityFeature
Indicates that an entity provides, embodies, or is associated with a mechanism or property intended to enhance safety, protection, or defense against threats or vulnerabilities.
-
D.
hasFeature
Indicates that an entity possesses, exhibits, or includes a particular characteristic, attribute, or component.
-
E.
supportsPolicy
Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or is in favor of a particular policy or set of policies.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25946a7ac8190a78871c210213272 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2605b372c8190831570aa6532cc96 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b7a8d148190aacdcc8ccb35c7f3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 3:02 a.m.