Triple

T28684248
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lieutenant General Walter C. Short E726086 entity
Predicate sharedCriticismWith P88723 FINISHED
Object Admiral Husband E. Kimmel NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Admiral Husband E. Kimmel | Statement: [Lieutenant General Walter C. Short, sharedCriticismWith, Admiral Husband E. Kimmel]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sharedCriticismWith
Context triple: [Lieutenant General Walter C. Short, sharedCriticismWith, Admiral Husband E. Kimmel]
  • A. hasCriticism
    Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval, objection, or negative evaluation directed toward another entity.
  • B. typeOfCriticism
    Indicates that one entity is a specific kind or category of criticism directed at another entity or subject.
  • C. criticismReason
    Indicates that one entity criticizes another entity specifically because of the stated reason.
  • D. criticizedFor
    Indicates that one entity expresses disapproval or negative judgment of another entity specifically because of a particular action, quality, or outcome.
  • E. sharesRebukeWith chosen
    Indicates that one entity communicates or directs a rebuke jointly with another entity, sharing in the act of reproving or criticizing.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01d867608819086bc3e6b4f9de866 completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd783fed9c81909e792702636c4f1f completed May 8, 2026, 5:44 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd7788e63c81909de22fdafcfe41c0 completed May 8, 2026, 5:41 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 5:11 a.m.