Triple
T28660985
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Regio II Apulia et Calabria |
E725465
|
entity |
| Predicate | romanNumeralDesignation |
P7465
|
FINISHED |
| Object | II |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: II | Statement: [Regio II Apulia et Calabria, romanNumeralDesignation, II]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: romanNumeralDesignation Context triple: [Regio II Apulia et Calabria, romanNumeralDesignation, II]
-
A.
RomanNumeral
chosen
Indicates that something is represented or written using the Roman numeral system.
-
B.
roleInRomanSystem
Indicates that one entity holds a specific function, position, or status within the structure or hierarchy of the Roman system.
-
C.
usesRomanNumerals
Indicates that something represents numbers or sequences using the Roman numeral system rather than standard Arabic digits.
-
D.
dateInRomanCalendar
Indicates that a given date is expressed according to the conventions and structure of the ancient Roman calendar system.
-
E.
hasRomanEquivalent
Indicates that one entity corresponds to or is equivalent to another entity within the context of Roman culture, naming, or classification.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d84f5f0819087ab5e6143b14ed7 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f65f7731e4819099d5bd3d915ee266 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:32 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f65c2198208190a3954086c22cfcbf |
completed | May 2, 2026, 8:18 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:58 a.m.