Triple
T28658078
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | The Doctrine of the Holy Spirit |
E725386
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasApologeticAim |
P181138
|
FINISHED |
| Object | defense of Christian doctrine of the Holy Spirit |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defense of Christian doctrine of the Holy Spirit | Statement: [The Doctrine of the Holy Spirit, hasApologeticAim, defense of Christian doctrine of the Holy Spirit]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasApologeticAim Context triple: [The Doctrine of the Holy Spirit, hasApologeticAim, defense of Christian doctrine of the Holy Spirit]
-
A.
hasApologeticGoal
Indicates that an entity’s goal or intended outcome involves expressing regret, making amends, or otherwise apologizing for a past action or situation.
-
B.
hasApologeticFunction
Indicates that something serves the role of expressing regret, remorse, or an apology in a given context.
-
C.
hasApologeticApproach
Indicates that one entity adopts a remorseful, apologizing stance or strategy toward another entity or situation.
-
D.
apologeticPurpose
Indicates that an action or expression is performed with the intention of apologizing or expressing regret.
-
E.
isApologyFor
Indicates that one entity expresses regret or remorse specifically in response to, or to make amends for, another entity (such as an action, event, or offense).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d84f5f0819087ab5e6143b14ed7 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7626667f48190ad90867eb67ec582 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f76175d6608190b60b268e20f49ed9 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:53 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f762651e088190baa21f25378a6065 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 2:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:56 a.m.