Triple

T28657965
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Doctrine of the Trinity E725383 entity
Predicate hasApologeticGoal P181055 FINISHED
Object defend Christian doctrine against charges of incoherence LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: defend Christian doctrine against charges of incoherence | Statement: [The Doctrine of the Trinity, hasApologeticGoal, defend Christian doctrine against charges of incoherence]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasApologeticGoal
Context triple: [The Doctrine of the Trinity, hasApologeticGoal, defend Christian doctrine against charges of incoherence]
  • A. hasApologeticFunction
    Indicates that something serves the role of expressing regret, remorse, or an apology in a given context.
  • B. hasApologeticApproach
    Indicates that one entity adopts a remorseful, apologizing stance or strategy toward another entity or situation.
  • C. apologeticPurpose
    Indicates that an action or expression is performed with the intention of apologizing or expressing regret.
  • D. isApologyFor
    Indicates that one entity expresses regret or remorse specifically in response to, or to make amends for, another entity (such as an action, event, or offense).
  • E. apologeticFunction
    Indicates that one entity expresses regret or remorse to another, acknowledging fault or seeking forgiveness for an action or outcome.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01d84f5f0819087ab5e6143b14ed7 completed April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f760a35b988190904e6267553ad2fe completed May 3, 2026, 2:50 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f75eb3d6f081908c933474eb359e3d completed May 3, 2026, 2:41 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f760a2a90c8190b8fbc55412ab752b completed May 3, 2026, 2:50 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:56 a.m.