Triple
T28648113
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Planning Act (Ontario) |
E725116
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalAppealBody |
P196242
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Ontario Municipal Board |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Ontario Municipal Board | Statement: [Planning Act (Ontario), historicalAppealBody, Ontario Municipal Board]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalAppealBody Context triple: [Planning Act (Ontario), historicalAppealBody, Ontario Municipal Board]
-
A.
historicalClaim
Indicates that an entity asserts or presents a statement about past events or conditions as a matter of historical fact.
-
B.
historicalClaimBy
Indicates that a particular historical assertion or interpretation is attributed to a specific source or agent.
-
C.
historicalIssue
Indicates that one entity is a past or previously existing edition, version, or instance of another entity, typically within a chronological sequence.
-
D.
historicalClarification
Indicates that one entity provides corrective or contextual information to resolve misunderstandings or ambiguities about another entity’s historical facts or events.
-
E.
legalHistory
Indicates that there exists a record of past legal actions, cases, or statuses associated with an entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d8423888190bd2f4e52605bf261 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe189fec148190aeef51b417ba15b0 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:08 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe17285b0881908de7569d8dbd20bd |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:02 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fe189f2ea48190b8c4718f1353970e |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:08 p.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:49 a.m.