Triple
T28618029
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | FIDO U2F |
E724315
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | two-factor authentication protocol |
C994
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: two-factor authentication protocol Context triple: [FIDO U2F, instanceOf, two-factor authentication protocol]
-
A.
cryptographic protocol
chosen
A cryptographic protocol is a precisely defined sequence of operations and message exchanges that uses cryptographic primitives to achieve security goals such as confidentiality, integrity, authentication, and non-repudiation between parties.
-
B.
cryptographic protocol framework
A cryptographic protocol framework is a structured set of tools, abstractions, and rules that enables the design, specification, analysis, and implementation of secure communication protocols.
-
C.
network security protocol
A network security protocol is a defined set of rules and procedures that protect data integrity, confidentiality, and authenticity during communication between devices over a network.
-
D.
additional protocol
An additional protocol is a supplementary legal instrument that amends, clarifies, or expands the provisions of an existing treaty or agreement without replacing it.
-
E.
cryptographic protocol message
A cryptographic protocol message is a structured unit of data exchanged between parties in a cryptographic protocol, containing information such as identifiers, nonces, keys, and signatures to achieve security goals like confidentiality, integrity, and authentication.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d822ac08190932de59ec2268ed2 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:32 a.m.