Triple
T28617931
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Client to Authenticator Protocol |
E724313
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | FIDO2 standard |
C23838
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: FIDO2 standard Context triple: [Client to Authenticator Protocol, instanceOf, FIDO2 standard]
-
A.
revision of NIST SP 800-56C
A revision of NIST SP 800-56C is an updated version of the NIST special publication that refines and clarifies recommendations for key derivation methods in key-establishment schemes using approved cryptographic primitives.
-
B.
Authenticator Assurance Level
Authenticator Assurance Level is a measure of the strength and reliability of an authentication process, indicating the degree of confidence that the user’s claimed identity is accurate based on the types and combinations of authenticators used.
-
C.
cryptographic standards framework
A cryptographic standards framework is a structured set of policies, protocols, and guidelines that define how cryptographic algorithms, key management, and security practices are selected, implemented, and maintained to ensure interoperable and robust protection of data and communications.
-
D.
public-key cryptography standard
A public-key cryptography standard is a formally defined specification that governs how asymmetric key pairs are generated, distributed, and used to securely encrypt, decrypt, sign, and verify digital data.
-
E.
authentication standard
chosen
An authentication standard is a defined set of rules and protocols that specify how identities are verified and access is securely granted across systems and applications.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d822ac08190932de59ec2268ed2 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:32 a.m.