Triple
T28583935
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Timeout Detection and Recovery |
E723442
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | GPU fault‑tolerance mechanism |
C54280
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: GPU fault‑tolerance mechanism Context triple: [Timeout Detection and Recovery, instanceOf, GPU fault‑tolerance mechanism]
-
A.
fault-tolerant consensus protocol
A fault-tolerant consensus protocol is a distributed algorithm that enables a group of nodes to reliably agree on a shared state or value even when some nodes fail or behave maliciously.
-
B.
InfiniBand interconnect generation
InfiniBand interconnect generation represents the process and configuration logic for creating, parameterizing, and managing high-speed InfiniBand fabric topologies and their associated connectivity resources.
-
C.
InfiniBand technology generation
InfiniBand technology generation represents a specific iteration of the InfiniBand architecture defined by its protocol features, performance capabilities, and compatibility characteristics across hardware and software implementations.
-
D.
GPU architecture
GPU architecture is the conceptual design and organization of a graphics processing unit’s cores, memory hierarchy, and data paths that enable massively parallel computation for graphics and general-purpose workloads.
-
E.
DDR coordination mechanism
A DDR coordination mechanism is a structured framework of processes, roles, and tools that align and synchronize disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration activities among stakeholders to ensure coherent, efficient, and conflict-sensitive implementation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01d7f92e481909847f5f3f3174a89 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 4:16 a.m.