Triple

T28549568
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sophie Moniotte E722842 entity
Predicate hasCompetitionPartner P61701 FINISHED
Object Pascal Lavanchy NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pascal Lavanchy | Statement: [Sophie Moniotte, hasCompetitionPartner, Pascal Lavanchy]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCompetitionPartner
Context triple: [Sophie Moniotte, hasCompetitionPartner, Pascal Lavanchy]
  • A. partnerInCompetition
    Indicates that two or more entities are collaborating as partners or teammates within the same competitive event or context.
  • B. hasPartnerInSport chosen
    Indicates that one entity has another entity as a partner with whom they jointly participate in a sport or sporting activity.
  • C. hasCompetition
    Indicates that one entity is in a state of rivalry or contest with another entity, typically competing for the same goal, resource, or advantage.
  • D. hasPartner
    Indicates that one entity is in a partner relationship (such as romantic, life, or business partnership) with another entity.
  • E. tieneCompetenciaEn
    Indicates that an entity possesses skill, expertise, or competence in a specific area, field, or activity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01a60204481909af1bb76247b8221 completed April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ffbf84f4948190b41a7bba07ae61ec completed May 9, 2026, 11:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ffbf0a59f88190870dbe25d8a63a00 completed May 9, 2026, 11:11 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:41 a.m.