Triple

T28540660
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Pamphylian Greek E722280 entity
Predicate hasDialectalGroup P1254 FINISHED
Object Pamphylian dialect NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pamphylian dialect | Statement: [Pamphylian Greek, hasDialectalGroup, Pamphylian dialect]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDialectalGroup
Context triple: [Pamphylian Greek, hasDialectalGroup, Pamphylian dialect]
  • A. hasMajorDialectGroup chosen
    Indicates that an entity (typically a language) is associated with a primary or major dialect group to which it belongs.
  • B. hasDialectContinuumWith
    Indicates that two languages or dialects are part of a continuous chain of mutually intelligible varieties, without a clear boundary separating them.
  • C. hasDialectalDifferenceWith
    Indicates that two language varieties differ from each other in dialectal features such as pronunciation, vocabulary, or grammar.
  • D. hasDialectalCounterpart
    Indicates that one linguistic form has a corresponding equivalent or variant in another dialect.
  • E. hasDialectalFeaturesSharedWith
    Indicates that two language varieties share specific dialectal features or characteristics in common.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f01a5e42348190b1ffbca26e739c84 completed April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fce28d6c3081908bf76f5db63ecf68 completed May 7, 2026, 7:05 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fce12d2f08819082134b5eb3db6a24 completed May 7, 2026, 6:59 p.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:35 a.m.