Triple
T28512111
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Donatist controversy |
E721516
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Christian theological controversy |
C3649
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Christian theological controversy Context triple: [Donatist controversy, instanceOf, Christian theological controversy]
-
A.
theological dispute
chosen
A theological dispute is a conflict or debate between individuals or groups over differing interpretations of religious doctrines, beliefs, or sacred texts.
-
B.
religious controversy
Religious controversy is a sustained conflict or debate arising from differing beliefs, doctrines, practices, or interpretations within or between religious traditions.
-
C.
Puritan controversy
A Puritan controversy is a historical or theological dispute arising within Puritan communities over matters of doctrine, church governance, or moral practice that challenged established religious authority and norms.
-
D.
theological dialogue
A theological dialogue is a structured conversational exchange in which participants explore, question, and interpret religious beliefs, doctrines, and experiences in pursuit of deeper understanding or truth.
-
E.
religious polemic
A religious polemic is a strongly worded written or spoken argument that attacks, criticizes, or refutes particular religious beliefs, practices, or institutions, often to defend an opposing theological position.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f01a5c072081908c7b04bcf6478da9 |
completed | April 28, 2026, 2:24 a.m. |
Created at: April 28, 2026, 3:13 a.m.