Triple
T285076
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Diocletian's Tetrarchy |
E5869
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalReformContext |
P2132
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Diocletianic reforms |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Diocletianic reforms | Statement: [Diocletian's Tetrarchy, legalReformContext, Diocletianic reforms]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalReformContext Context triple: [Diocletian's Tetrarchy, legalReformContext, Diocletianic reforms]
-
A.
reform
Indicates bringing about significant changes to an existing system, practice, or entity in order to improve or correct it.
-
B.
relatedLegislation
Indicates that there exists a legislative document that is connected to, affects, or is otherwise relevant to the subject entity.
-
C.
legalDoctrine
Indicates that one legal principle, rule, or theory is being applied, referenced, or relied upon as an authoritative basis for interpreting or deciding a legal issue.
-
D.
legalContext
chosen
Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within, is shaped by, or is relevant to a specific legal framework, proceeding, or set of legal norms.
-
E.
notableReform
Indicates that an entity is recognized for having initiated, led, or been central to a significant reform or transformative change in a system, policy, or institution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25946a7ac8190a78871c210213272 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2605b372c8190831570aa6532cc96 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b7a8d148190aacdcc8ccb35c7f3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 3:02 a.m.