Triple
T2841882
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Alf Landon |
E62487
|
entity |
| Predicate | popular vote percentage in 1936 election |
P42972
|
FINISHED |
| Object | approximately 36.5% |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: approximately 36.5% | Statement: [Alf Landon, popular vote percentage in 1936 election, approximately 36.5%]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: popular vote percentage in 1936 election Context triple: [Alf Landon, popular vote percentage in 1936 election, approximately 36.5%]
-
A.
RooseveltPopularVotePercentage
Indicates the percentage of the total popular vote that was received by Roosevelt in a given election or context.
-
B.
RooseveltPopularVotes
Indicates the number of popular votes received by Roosevelt in a given election or voting context.
-
C.
smithPopularVotePercentage
Indicates the percentage of the popular vote that was received by the entity named Smith in a given election or voting context.
-
D.
voterTurnoutPercentage
Indicates the proportion of eligible or registered voters who actually cast a ballot in a given election, expressed as a percentage.
-
E.
typicalPresidentialVote
Indicates that the vote cast aligns with the usual or characteristic voting pattern observed in presidential elections.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4c3d16bc81908b3a1c98fbd287fe |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdf16d0c08190bb8de4a4160b4414 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:17 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abdd0ce8b08190ba28c192988f38ce |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abde4895dc819097c396c5d31ac1d1 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:14 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 10:01 p.m.