Triple
T2838804
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Piast dynasty |
E62413
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Poznań Piasts
Poznań Piasts were a branch of the early medieval Polish Piast dynasty associated with the city of Poznań, playing a key role in the formation of the Polish state.
|
E343382
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Poznań Piasts | Statement: [Piast dynasty, hasPart, Poznań Piasts]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Poznań Piasts Context triple: [Piast dynasty, hasPart, Poznań Piasts]
-
A.
Inowrocław Piasts
The Inowrocław Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s early medieval Piast royal family that ruled the Inowrocław area.
-
B.
Głogów Piasts
Głogów Piasts were a regional branch of the medieval Polish Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Głogów and surrounding Silesian territories.
-
C.
Racibórz Piasts
The Racibórz Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s medieval Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Racibórz in Silesia.
-
D.
Opole Piasts
The Opole Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Opole and surrounding Silesian territories during the Middle Ages.
-
E.
Żagań Piasts
Żagań Piasts were a Silesian branch of the medieval Polish Piast royal dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Żagań.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Poznań Piasts Triple: [Piast dynasty, hasPart, Poznań Piasts]
Generated description
Poznań Piasts were a branch of the early medieval Polish Piast dynasty associated with the city of Poznań, playing a key role in the formation of the Polish state.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Poznań Piasts Target entity description: Poznań Piasts were a branch of the early medieval Polish Piast dynasty associated with the city of Poznań, playing a key role in the formation of the Polish state.
-
A.
Inowrocław Piasts
The Inowrocław Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s early medieval Piast royal family that ruled the Inowrocław area.
-
B.
Głogów Piasts
Głogów Piasts were a regional branch of the medieval Polish Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Głogów and surrounding Silesian territories.
-
C.
Racibórz Piasts
The Racibórz Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s medieval Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Racibórz in Silesia.
-
D.
Opole Piasts
The Opole Piasts were a regional branch of Poland’s Piast dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Opole and surrounding Silesian territories during the Middle Ages.
-
E.
Żagań Piasts
Żagań Piasts were a Silesian branch of the medieval Polish Piast royal dynasty that ruled the Duchy of Żagań.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4c3d16bc81908b3a1c98fbd287fe |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdef015bc81909f6a2ff17b22862f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:16 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_69b2e80d295c8190920a2ef165dfdef4 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 4:21 p.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_69b2e87cfe108190b2cd16eaf2e0b046 |
completed | March 12, 2026, 4:23 p.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_69b2e8f87c408190b489bbfa0928327c |
completed | March 12, 2026, 4:25 p.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 10:01 p.m.