Triple

T28348481
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dalny E718021 entity
Predicate presentAdministrativeStatus P38445 FINISHED
Object sub-provincial city LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: sub-provincial city | Statement: [Dalny, presentAdministrativeStatus, sub-provincial city]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: presentAdministrativeStatus
Context triple: [Dalny, presentAdministrativeStatus, sub-provincial city]
  • A. administrativeStatusCurrent chosen
    Indicates the current administrative status or condition of an entity within a governing or managing system.
  • B. administrativeStatusOfEntityRepresented
    Indicates the current administrative or operational status assigned to the entity that is being represented.
  • C. formerAdministrativeStatus
    Indicates that an entity previously held, but no longer holds, a particular administrative status or role.
  • D. actualStatus
    Indicates the current, real-world state or condition of an entity, as opposed to a planned, expected, or nominal status.
  • E. hasCurrentAdministrativeEntity
    Indicates that an entity is currently governed, managed, or overseen by a specific administrative body or authority.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69eff6ec27b481908c8d7b86c47893d9 completed April 27, 2026, 11:53 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f6e6029a10819098ff21f58079e70e completed May 3, 2026, 6:06 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f6e3d5e8188190b1e1c2e5d1b77031 completed May 3, 2026, 5:57 a.m.
Created at: April 28, 2026, 12:44 a.m.