Triple
T2832097
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New Jersey Plan |
E62261
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalSupremacyClause |
P2949
|
FINISHED |
| Object | national laws supreme over state laws |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: national laws supreme over state laws | Statement: [New Jersey Plan, legalSupremacyClause, national laws supreme over state laws]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalSupremacyClause Context triple: [New Jersey Plan, legalSupremacyClause, national laws supreme over state laws]
-
A.
supremacyClause
chosen
Indicates that one legal authority, rule, or agreement takes precedence over and invalidates conflicting lower-level laws or provisions.
-
B.
constitutionalClause
Indicates that one entity is a specific clause or provision contained within a constitution that governs or constrains another entity.
-
C.
subjectToConstitution
Indicates that an entity is governed, constrained, or regulated by the rules and principles of a specific constitution.
-
D.
constitutionalLimit
Indicates that there is a restriction or boundary imposed by a constitution on the powers, actions, or rights involved in the relationship.
-
E.
constitutionalEffect
Indicates the impact or consequence that something has on a constitution or constitutional order.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ab4c3c39188190955b9c49d98463d8 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 9:50 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abdebe95188190bf65fb4cd88e2ec5 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:15 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abdd0acab881909e8c25cbef83678c |
completed | March 7, 2026, 8:08 a.m. |
Created at: March 6, 2026, 10:01 p.m.