Triple

T28297
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Indo-European language family E564 entity
Predicate hasProtoLanguage P2179 FINISHED
Object Proto-Indo-European language LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Proto-Indo-European language | Statement: [Indo-European language family, hasProtoLanguage, Proto-Indo-European language]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasProtoLanguage
Context triple: [Indo-European language family, hasProtoLanguage, Proto-Indo-European language]
  • A. hasSignificantLanguage
    Indicates that an entity possesses a language that plays an important or primary role in its communication, identity, or functioning.
  • B. hasLanguageOfOrigin
    Indicates that one entity has its origin or source in the language specified by another entity.
  • C. hasEndonym
    Indicates that an entity has a name or designation used by native speakers or within its own local language or community.
  • D. nativeLanguage
    Indicates the language that a person or entity originally learned and uses as their primary or first language.
  • E. recognizedLanguage
    Indicates that an entity has identified, detected, or acknowledged a particular language as being used or present.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a2479dec388190967ba648663442c9 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a24925607c8190a9ce7ec834f3e5bb completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a2486bd74c81908d32be3c7d22f51f completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a249246968819099985f13127063d2 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 1:47 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 1:44 a.m.