Triple
T282812
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Palestinian |
E5824
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCollectiveRightClaim |
P9071
|
FINISHED |
| Object | right of return |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: right of return | Statement: [Palestinian, hasCollectiveRightClaim, right of return]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCollectiveRightClaim Context triple: [Palestinian, hasCollectiveRightClaim, right of return]
-
A.
supportsClaim
Indicates that one entity provides evidence, reasoning, or backing that strengthens or validates the truth or credibility of another entity’s claim.
-
B.
usedCollectiveName
Indicates that a group of entities is referred to by a shared collective name.
-
C.
hasCollection
Indicates that an entity possesses, maintains, or is associated with a set or group of related items treated as a collection.
-
D.
mainClaim
Indicates that one statement is presented as the central or primary assertion being made about a topic.
-
E.
parliamentClaim
Indicates that a parliamentary body formally asserts, states, or maintains a particular proposition, position, or fact.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25946a7ac8190a78871c210213272 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25e0c14b48190a5c936bab36180b3 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b795a6c8190944d48e8418e0ccd |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a25c4b773c81908f1017f40b0bfd07 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:08 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 3:02 a.m.