Triple
T28170371
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | R. v. Drybones |
E715440
|
entity |
| Predicate | impugnedLaw |
P10247
|
FINISHED |
| Object | a federal law that criminalized certain conduct by an Indigenous person that was not criminal for non-Indigenous persons |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: a federal law that criminalized certain conduct by an Indigenous person that was not criminal for non-Indigenous persons | Statement: [R. v. Drybones, impugnedLaw, a federal law that criminalized certain conduct by an Indigenous person that was not criminal for non-Indigenous persons]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: impugnedLaw Context triple: [R. v. Drybones, impugnedLaw, a federal law that criminalized certain conduct by an Indigenous person that was not criminal for non-Indigenous persons]
-
A.
legalDoctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal doctrine is being disputed, questioned, or contested, typically through litigation or formal legal argument.
-
B.
challengedStatute
chosen
Indicates that a particular statute or law is being contested, questioned, or disputed, typically in a legal or constitutional proceeding.
-
C.
legalInstrumentChallenged
Indicates that a particular legal instrument (such as a law, regulation, contract, or order) is being formally disputed or contested, typically through legal or administrative proceedings.
-
D.
overturnedLaw
Indicates that a previously established law has been invalidated or reversed, typically by a higher legal authority or court decision.
-
E.
doctrineChallenged
Indicates that a particular doctrine, principle, or set of beliefs is being questioned, disputed, or formally contested.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69efd6b340f0819095680e15dcdc1830 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 9:35 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f643ed0b7481908cf25f3afec0a61d |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:35 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f641def1e88190a05bf865ced78b23 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:26 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 10:12 p.m.