Triple

T281338
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Crito E5359 entity
Predicate ethicalConcernInDialogue P4934 FINISHED
Object reputation among the many (public opinion) LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: reputation among the many (public opinion) | Statement: [Crito, ethicalConcernInDialogue, reputation among the many (public opinion)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ethicalConcernInDialogue
Context triple: [Crito, ethicalConcernInDialogue, reputation among the many (public opinion)]
  • A. ethicalDebate
    Indicates a relationship where parties are engaged in discussing, questioning, or disputing the moral rightness or wrongness of actions, policies, or principles.
  • B. positionOnEthics chosen
    Indicates a stance, viewpoint, or opinion that an entity holds regarding ethical principles, issues, or practices.
  • C. hasEthicalAssessment
    Indicates that an entity has been evaluated according to ethical criteria or standards.
  • D. concernsRight
    Indicates that something is about or relates specifically to a legal or moral right held by an entity.
  • E. hasEthicalTeaching
    Indicates that one entity provides, promotes, or embodies instruction or guidance related to ethical principles, values, or moral conduct for another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a257e6c8788190987dfe705ca2912a completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25e0a23c0819083abee28b2dea49c completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b77e028819087e606fc321219f7 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:59 a.m.