Triple
T281061
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | J |
E5354
|
entity |
| Predicate | sharesRouteWith |
P9558
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Z |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Z | Statement: [J, sharesRouteWith, Z]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sharesRouteWith Context triple: [J, sharesRouteWith, Z]
-
A.
sharesFeatureWith
Indicates that two entities have at least one common attribute, property, or characteristic in common.
-
B.
sharesEventWith
Indicates that two entities participate in, are associated with, or are linked through the same event.
-
C.
sharesInteractionPointWith
Indicates that two entities have at least one common point or location at which they can interact or make contact with each other.
-
D.
shareFeature
Indicates that two or more entities possess at least one common attribute, property, or characteristic.
-
E.
sharesPowerWith
Indicates that two or more entities jointly hold, exercise, or distribute authority or control in a shared manner.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a257e6c8788190987dfe705ca2912a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a25e0a23c0819083abee28b2dea49c |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25b77e028819087e606fc321219f7 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69a25e06dd7c8190a8cbb76cee3c6e4b |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 3:16 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:59 a.m.