Triple

T28075858
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Langya Commandery E709539 entity
Predicate historicallyNotableDuring P8452 FINISHED
Object Han dynasty NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Han dynasty | Statement: [Langya Commandery, historicallyNotableDuring, Han dynasty]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicallyNotableDuring
Context triple: [Langya Commandery, historicallyNotableDuring, Han dynasty]
  • A. historicalNotability
    Indicates that an entity is recognized as having significant importance, influence, or prominence in history.
  • B. notablePeriodOfInterest
    Indicates a time span that is particularly significant or noteworthy in relation to the subject.
  • C. hasHistoricalSignificanceThrough
    Indicates that one entity possesses historical importance or relevance by means of, or as established through, its connection or association with another entity or event.
  • D. chronologicallyNotableEvent
    Indicates that an event is significant or noteworthy in terms of its position or impact within a chronological sequence of events.
  • E. notableDuring chosen
    Indicates that something was especially prominent, active, or significant during a particular time period or event.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef9b6f8078819098b741274cd1a2ee completed April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fdd07a34c08190982b8c61c2775cf6 completed May 8, 2026, noon
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fdbd25c7908190b72fca8de7ce503f completed May 8, 2026, 10:38 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:48 p.m.