Triple

T28072228
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Nisa E709437 entity
Predicate hasMunicipalRelationshipWith P178783 FINISHED
Object Liberec NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Liberec | Statement: [Nisa, hasMunicipalRelationshipWith, Liberec]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasMunicipalRelationshipWith
Context triple: [Nisa, hasMunicipalRelationshipWith, Liberec]
  • A. typeOfMunicipalRelationship
    Indicates a formal type or category of administrative or cooperative relationship that exists between municipalities.
  • B. isMunicipalHomeOf
    Indicates that a municipality serves as the official home base or hosting location for a particular entity or organization.
  • C. servesAsMunicipalAuthorityFor
    Indicates that an entity functions as the official municipal governing or administrative authority for a specified locality or jurisdiction.
  • D. hasMunicipalPart
    Indicates that an administrative or territorial entity includes a municipality as one of its constituent parts.
  • E. hasMunicipalityBoundaryRole
    Indicates that an entity participates in or is assigned a specific role related to the boundary of a municipality (such as defining, managing, or being affected by that boundary).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ef9b6f8078819098b741274cd1a2ee completed April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f71422adac8190a5ceb32dcf820833 completed May 3, 2026, 9:23 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f712764d2c819081b64b27e5de4a13 completed May 3, 2026, 9:16 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f71421e8d08190807ccfb15d0f0ddb completed May 3, 2026, 9:23 a.m.
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:46 p.m.