Triple
T28060505
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John Loughlin |
E709093
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfJurisdictionHeLed |
P3734
|
FINISHED |
| Object | diocese |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: diocese | Statement: [John Loughlin, typeOfJurisdictionHeLed, diocese]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfJurisdictionHeLed Context triple: [John Loughlin, typeOfJurisdictionHeLed, diocese]
-
A.
hadJurisdictionType
Indicates that a governing body, authority, or legal entity possessed a specific type or scope of jurisdiction over a matter, area, or population.
-
B.
typeOfJurisdiction
chosen
Indicates the specific kind or category of legal authority or control that one jurisdiction holds in relation to a given legal or administrative context.
-
C.
workedAsJudgeOn
Indicates that a person served in the role of a judge in connection with a particular case, court, or judicial proceeding.
-
D.
jurisdictionRepresented
Indicates that one entity acts on behalf of, or serves as the official representative for, a particular legal or administrative jurisdiction.
-
E.
definedJurisdictionOf
Indicates that one entity formally establishes or specifies the scope, boundaries, or authority of another entity’s jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef9b6eb6d88190a3fea236eb0f7bed |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe5c1a502081909d4024e514309c8e |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:56 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe5a9df21c819087153f5d0bcaa987 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 9:50 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:39 p.m.