Triple
T28056406
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | simulation hypothesis |
E708977
|
entity |
| Predicate | testabilityProposal |
P90121
|
FINISHED |
| Object | search for computational limits in physical constants |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: search for computational limits in physical constants | Statement: [simulation hypothesis, testabilityProposal, search for computational limits in physical constants]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: testabilityProposal Context triple: [simulation hypothesis, testabilityProposal, search for computational limits in physical constants]
-
A.
testability
Indicates the degree to which a system, component, or behavior can be effectively and reliably tested to verify its correctness or performance.
-
B.
proposalType
chosen
Indicates the specific category or kind of proposal associated with an entity or event.
-
C.
testedFor
Indicates that an entity has been examined or analyzed to determine the presence, absence, or level of another specified entity or condition.
-
D.
test
Indicates that an entity performs, undergoes, or is associated with a testing or examination process involving another entity or condition.
-
E.
testedDesignFeature
Indicates that a specific design feature has been subjected to a test or evaluation process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef9b6df9f48190bbb971d02cbe1b65 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f63fdcaf288190b0b5118b835b940b |
completed | May 2, 2026, 6:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f637120c008190b2b5adf46f022e48 |
completed | May 2, 2026, 5:40 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:36 p.m.