Triple
T28054553
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California |
E708925
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | water rights decree |
C8918
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: water rights decree Context triple: [Supreme Court decree in Arizona v. California, instanceOf, water rights decree]
-
A.
water management law
Water management law is the body of legal rules and principles governing the allocation, use, protection, and regulation of water resources among public and private users.
-
B.
water resources development act
The Water Resources Development Act is a recurring United States federal law that authorizes and guides the planning, construction, and maintenance of water resources projects such as navigation, flood control, and ecosystem restoration, primarily carried out by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
-
C.
water management policy decision
A water management policy decision is a deliberate choice by authorities or stakeholders that sets rules, priorities, and actions for allocating, conserving, and protecting water resources to balance environmental, social, and economic needs.
-
D.
water resources management agreement
chosen
A water resources management agreement is a formal arrangement between parties that defines rights, responsibilities, and coordinated actions for the sustainable allocation, use, protection, and monitoring of shared water resources.
-
E.
water management project
A water management project is an organized initiative that plans, develops, and operates systems and practices to sustainably collect, store, distribute, and protect water resources for human and environmental needs.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ef9b6df9f48190bbb971d02cbe1b65 |
completed | April 27, 2026, 5:22 p.m. |
Created at: April 27, 2026, 8:35 p.m.